Skip to main content

Low Self-Esteem Formulation

The cognitive approach to low self-esteem proposes that negative beliefs about the self are maintained by biased information processing, including perceptual and interpretation bias. This worksheet describes the sequence by which negative self-beliefs in low self-esteem are maintained. It can be used to help clients to explore their negative beliefs and predictions, rules for living, how they interpret what happens to them, and the consequences of those interpretations.

Download or send

Choose your language

Notice: The 'Fillable PDF' format has been retired. For resources with form elements, both the 'Professional' and 'Client' versions are now available as fillable PDFs by default.

Professional version

Offers theory, guidance, and prompts for mental health professionals. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Client version

Includes client-friendly guidance. Downloads are in Fillable PDF format where appropriate.

Editable version (PPT)

An editable Microsoft PowerPoint version of the resource.

Translation Template

Are you a qualified therapist who would like to help with our translation project?

Tags

Languages this resource is available in

  • Arabic
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Croatian
  • English (GB)
  • English (US)
  • French
  • German
  • Greek
  • Italian
  • Latvian
  • Serbian
  • Spanish (International)

Problems this resource might be used to address

Techniques associated with this resource

Mechanisms associated with this resource

Introduction & Theoretical Background

At the core of low self-esteem are negative beliefs or judgements about the self, which persist despite seemingly contradictory evidence. Melanie Fennell draws upon Christine Padesky’s metaphor to describe negative beliefs in low self-esteem as being analogous to prejudices: unfair and ill-informed. Fennell argues that information relating to the negative beliefs may be subject to perceptual and interpretation biases:

  • Perceptual bias: Information that is consistent with one’s beliefs is readily accessible and easily processed, whereas data inconsistent with the negative belief is ‘screened out’.
  • Interpretation bias: Information that is perceived is biased towards the negative belief. Ambiguous data is interpreted negatively, and positive or neutral data is distorted to fit. Negative data is “attributed to enduring flaws or weaknesses”.

Fennell proposes that negative beliefs in low self-esteem are perpetuated by a sequence in which:

  1. Negative beliefs are activated by situations in which rules and standards are threatened.

Get access to this resource

View all plans and pricing options

Get Access

Therapist Guidance

“Surprisingly, people with low self-esteem often continue to think badly of themselves despite having achievements and successes. Would you be willing to help me to understand more about what happens when you have successes and setbacks?”  

1. Situations

Situations in which our rules or personal standards might be broken are often the most triggering. For example, if someone has the rule “I’m OK as long as I’m not criticized”, situations where they might get feedback from other people can be particularly stressful for them.

  • Can you think of a recent situation that made you feel particularly anxious?
  • Can you think about a recent situation when you gave yourself a hard time?

2. Beliefs & rules

Our positive and negative beliefs about ourselves are based on the things that have happened to us. These beliefs are often expressed in the form “I am …”, as if it is

Get access to this resource

View all plans and pricing options

Get Access

References And Further Reading

  • Fennell, M. J. (1997). Low self-esteem: A cognitive perspective. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 25(1), 1-26.
  • Padesky, C. A. (1990). Schema as self-prejudice. International Cognitive Therapy Newsletter, 6(1), 6-7.

Get access to this resource

View all plans and pricing options

Get Access