Introduction & Theoretical Background
Values in acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)
Values are discussed in many psychotherapies, including logotherapy (Frankl, 1946), person-centered therapy (Rogers, 1964), existential therapy (Yalom, 1980), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; e.g., Beck et al., 2021; McKay et al, 1981), motivational interviewing (e.g., Miller & Rollnick, 2023), behavioral activation (Kanter et al., 2010), and positive psychotherapy (e.g., Slade et al., 2017). Kirschenbuam (2013) provides a comprehensive history of values clarification interventions in counseling, tracing them back to the work of Louis Raths (1963) who was inspired by the work of John Dewey (1909, 1939). Raths’ work was later expanded by Sidney Simon and Merril Hamlin (Raths, Hamin, Simon, 1966, 1978) and by Howard Kirschenabum (Simon, Howe & Kirschenabum, 1972).
Among modern approaches to psychotherapy, ACT has proven to be the most fertile ground for values work. Grounded in basic behavioral principles and relational frame theory, ACT is primarily a behavioral treatment, which aims to